For managers of product teams
Understand the product team you actually have.
See each product manager’s demonstrated strengths, readiness, and coaching priorities using one consistent, evidence-based assessment.
Choose your scope
Assess your team, or assess yourself
Both run the same adaptive interview against the same evidence standard. The team view adds a shared picture across everyone who completes one, and every person still keeps their own report.
For your team
Team Assessment
Invite up to 8 people, no credit card
Everyone you invite keeps their own report. You get a team competency heatmap, the gaps you share, who is ready for the next level, and one-on-one agendas built from the same evidence.
For you
Full Assessment
About 2 hours, and you can stop anytime
All 16 dimensions in a single adaptive interview. Produces a full participant report, a scorecard, and a personalized development plan. Save and pick it back up whenever you want.
Start my assessmentWhat you get
A preview of your team report
Natalie Brooks and her team are a demo org, not real people, and no real participant’s data appears here. Every panel below is the same component your own team view renders: the team profile, every member against every dimension, shared strengths and gaps, readiness across the team, one-on-one agendas, and movement since the last assessment.
Team profile
Average score across each competency group.
- Ethics & Responsibility and Customer Centricity are the team's clearest strengths, both scoring well above the rest of the group.
- Day-to-day execution discipline is solid and consistent across members.
- AI-Era Product Leadership is the team's biggest gap, the lowest score on the team, with people leadership and commercial acumen not far behind.
- Strategic thinking as a whole trails execution and commercial judgment: building a shared point of view on AI-driven product opportunities would be the highest-leverage next step.
Every member, every dimension
| Strategy | Execution | Leadership | Commercial | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team member | Strategy | Market | Innov. | AI Lead. | Priority | Exec. | Data | Tech | Comms | Stake | People Lead. | Op. Model | Comm. | Cust. | Ethics | Learn. Veloc. |
| Elena Petrov | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Frank Rogers | 9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 |
| Jane Walsh | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| John Smith | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Jordan Alvarez | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Marcus Bennett | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Maya Chen | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 | |
| Priya Nair | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
Elena Petrov
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 6
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 5
- Innovation Behavior
- 5
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 5
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 5
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 4
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 5
- Technical Competency
- 5
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 7
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 6
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 9
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 7
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 6
- Customer Centricity
- 6
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 6
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 5
Frank Rogers
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 9
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 8
- Innovation Behavior
- 7
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 5
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 8
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 8
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 7
- Technical Competency
- 7
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 9
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 9
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 8
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 8
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 8
- Customer Centricity
- 8
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 9
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 6
Jane Walsh
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 6
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 5
- Innovation Behavior
- 5
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 5
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 7
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 7
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 6
- Technical Competency
- 5
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 6
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 6
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 4
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 5
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 6
- Customer Centricity
- 8
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 8
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 7
John Smith
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 6
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 6
- Innovation Behavior
- 5
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 5
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 6
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 6
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 4
- Technical Competency
- 5
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 9
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 8
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 6
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 6
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 6
- Customer Centricity
- 6
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 7
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 6
Jordan Alvarez
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 5
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 4
- Innovation Behavior
- 7
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 8
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 5
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 6
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 7
- Technical Competency
- 8
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 4
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 4
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 3
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 5
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 3
- Customer Centricity
- 5
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 7
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 7
Marcus Bennett
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 9
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 9
- Innovation Behavior
- 7
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 6
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 7
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 7
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 7
- Technical Competency
- 6
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 7
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 7
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 6
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 7
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 8
- Customer Centricity
- 7
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 8
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 7
Maya Chen
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 3
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 4
- Innovation Behavior
- 6
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 5
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 5
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 6
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 8
- Technical Competency
- 6
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 4
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 4
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 4
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 4
- Customer Centricity
- 7
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 7
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 8
Priya Nair
Strategic Thinking
- Product Strategy
- 7
- Market & Competitive Judgment
- 6
- Innovation Behavior
- 6
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- 6
Execution & Judgment
- Prioritization & Judgment
- 9
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
- 9
- Analytics & Data Judgment
- 7
- Technical Competency
- 6
Leadership & Influence
- Communication & Executive Presence
- 6
- Stakeholder Management & Influence
- 7
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- 5
- Product Operating Model Maturity
- 7
Commercial & Customer Judgment
- Commercial & Business Acumen
- 6
- Customer Centricity
- 7
- Ethics & Responsibility
- 8
- Learning Velocity & Adaptability
- 7
Strengths and gaps
Showing the top 3 strengths and top 3 gaps here; the full report includes more dimensions.
Team strengths
- Ethics & Responsibility
- Customer Centricity
- Execution & Delivery Discipline
Where the team is weakest
- AI-Era Product Leadership
- People Leadership & Talent Development
- Commercial & Business Acumen
Readiness distribution
- Developing3members
- Near Ready2members
- Ready2members
- Strongly Ready1member
Elena’s next 1-on-1 agenda
Talking points
- Recognize a current strength: People Leadership & Talent Development.
- Discuss the development focus area: Execution & Delivery Discipline.
- Discuss the development focus area: Technical Competency.
- Discuss the development focus area: Prioritization & Judgment.
- Surface any blockers on assigned learning activities.
- Agree on one concrete commitment before the next 1-on-1.
Strengths
- People Leadership & Talent Development (9/10)
Development focus
- Execution & Delivery Discipline (4/10)
- Technical Competency (5/10)
- Prioritization & Judgment (5/10)
Current objectives
- Establish an early-warning habit for at-risk cross-team commitmentscomplete
Execution & Delivery Discipline
- ✓ Agile for the Modern Product Manager
- ✓ Shape Up: Stop Running in Circles and Ship Work that Matters
- Formalize a prioritization framework so calls stop changing directioncomplete
Prioritization & Judgment
- ✓ RICE Prioritization Framework for Product Managers
- ✓ RICE Scoring Model
Movement since last assessment
Illustrative example, not real data. Movement appears here once a team member re-takes the assessment. Here is what that looks like for Elena Petrov on two dimensions.
- Execution & Delivery Discipline+1increase3 months ago3Today4
- Prioritization & Judgment+1increase3 months ago4Today5
Want the read-only roster and an individual member deep-dive? See the full sample team report.
Team decisions
Built for the questions managers actually bring to a team review
Everyone you invite answers realistic product judgment prompts, and each answer is probed for evidence, context, scale, and results before any of it reaches your team view.
Who on my team is ready for the next level?
Readiness is reported separately from current level and carries its own confidence rating, so it reads as evidence you can discuss rather than a verdict handed down.
Where is my team collectively thin?
Strengths and gaps aggregate across everyone who completed an assessment, so a shared weakness shows up as a team pattern instead of five unrelated notes.
What should this person’s next 1-on-1 be about?
Each member gets an agenda built from their own evidence, so coaching starts from specific work rather than a general impression.
Am I holding everyone to the same standard?
Every person runs the same adaptive interview against the same 16 dimensions, so the comparison across your team rests on one rubric, not on who you have seen most recently.
Is anyone actually growing?
Movement since the last assessment shows which dimensions changed and which did not, so development plans can be checked instead of assumed.
Before you start
- How long does it take?
- About 2 hours, across as many sittings as you like. Your progress saves after every answer, so it moves at your pace, one question at a time.
- Who receives the report?
- You always receive your own developmental report. If an organization sponsored your assessment, they receive a separate report written for their decision. You are told which applies before the interview begins.
- Does this replace human judgment?
- No. The report is built to inform a hiring, promotion, or development conversation, not to make the decision on its own.
See your team through one evidence standard
This is what a manager sees once their team completes the assessment. Set it up for your own team in a few minutes.